Glendale’s ECCTYC Presentation
Presentation at ECCTYC, October 21, by Lara Kartalian and Sarah McLemore (Glendale College)
Glendale Community College’s Faculty Inquiry Network Project
English 120: English 120 is a class in pre-collegiate composition which provides practice in writing, analysis and organization. Upon successful completion of English 120, students are expected to 1) write cogent, well-developed arguments that clearly articulate a thesis supported by textual evidence, 2) read critically by summarizing, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating college-level texts, 3) select, evaluate, interpret, and synthesize sources in the service of an argument, and 4) document sources in MLA style. English 120 is a crucial course in the English Division’s sequence as it bridges the developmental and transfer-level English courses taught at Glendale Community College.
FIN Project’s Origin: Over the last several years, there have been a significant number of instructors who have begun to take on the “incremental and technology” based theory which grew out of the Carnegie Grant project.
The “Incremental and Technology-Based” pedagogy is an outgrowth of the Full E-mersion project, an advanced electronic pedagogy for developmental composition that has been the subject of the Carnegie basic skills project for the last several years. The original premise of the innovation was to infuse as much technology as possible in a developmental composition course and explore the outcomes. The new pedagogy represents the fullest realization of reading and writing integration in a GCC basic skills composition course. From day one, students learn to read “microscopically,” dissecting texts and using textual evidence to formulate argumentative writing. The incremental component of the pedagogy nurtures good study skills by giving students a large number of manageable tasks, thus creating an academic atmosphere in which they become motivated through success and establish the momentum necessary to maintain their energy and drive.
The new pedagogy shifts the emphasis of developmental composition instruction away from personal experience-based writing to analysis of sources (photographic, textual, etc.). In particular, the modified English 120 curriculum teaches the four cornerstones of academic writing—analysis, abstraction, citation, and interpretation—from day one of instruction. When offered in incremental and highly structured format, these learning opportunities peak students’ intellectual curiosity and engage them in rigorous critical thinking.
The Faculty Inquiry Network Project at Glendale Community College: Our project is designed to examine how teaching techniques and an incrementalized approach to the teaching of expository writing and literary analysis in English 120 may be applied to other disciplinary contexts. Will what works in English 120 work in other courses to enhance student success and engage students?
Project Timeline:
- Spring 2009: Faculty members from Political Science, Credit ESL, and Astronomy sat in on either Lara Kartalian or Sarah McLemore’s English 120 classes to investigate the pedagogy used in Lara and Sarah’s classrooms. Each faculty member sat in for three weeks for each class meeting. They also interviewed students to gauge their responses to the course materials and pedagogical methods.
Based on their research, each faculty member developed a proposal to apply one facet of the English 120 course principles to their own teaching.
- Fall 2009: Faculty members make their proposals a reality.
Fall 2009 Faculty Projects Based on Observations of English 120 in Spring 2009
Cameron Hastings, Political Science: Cameron is tactically applying the techniques English 120 instructors use to get students to select the best evidence to use in their written work. In doing so, Cameron hopes to enhance her students’ capabilities in gathering and synthesizing evidence and data.
Jennifer Krestow, Astronomy: Jennifer has revised the process by which she’s asked students to gather data and summarize information connected to a variety of course principles. She has already noted heightened student engagement and better comprehension of course principles in student quizzes, discussions, and written work.
Paul Vera, Credit ESL: Paul has begun a survey of student responses regarding a comment faculty members often write on student papers: “be more specific.” By researching his students and conducting “think-alouds” with students, he hopes to generate ideas of how to make his comments on student work more effective and, well, more specific.
Looking Ahead: Anticipated Goals for Spring 2010 and Beyond
-Recruit additional faculty to observe English 120 courses for Spring 2010. These faculty will then design a project (Spring 2010) and apply it (Fall 2010)
-Faculty in Political Science, Astronomy, and Credit ESL complete their projects and apply them to future courses
Glendale budget 2009
| Year | Proposed Budget | |||||
| Hours | Hourly $ | Amount | ||||
| Faculty Release (%FTE) | $16,000 | |||||
| Faculty Stipends | $1,500 | |||||
| Student Co-Inquirers | $1,000 | |||||
| Classified/Tech Assistance | ||||||
| Benefits | ||||||
| Supplies and Materials | ||||||
| Team Retreats | ||||||
| Other | ||||||
| Total | 18500 | |||||
Glendale Community College
Glendale College Mid-term Inquiry Update Video
A team of three Glendale College faculty members from ESL, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences will use an incremental classroom to strengthen student outcomes.
Over the last few years, Chris Juzwiak has developed the incremental” approach for developmental English courses at Glendale Community College (see http://courseweb.glendale.edu/thefullemersion/) In brief, the incremental approach divides course learning goals into many small steps, engaging students in tasks using color-coded analyses of texts, daily homework, in-class small group work, and tasks repeated with less and less support, all building toward significant work such as a complete essay that experience has shown to be a difficult task for many students. These protocols are based on learning principles that recognize the importance of metacognition, immediate feedback, explicit instruction on expert-like thinking, varied visual and auditory prompts, and the sequencing of tasks based on Bloom’s taxonomy.
In adapting the incremental approach to other disciplines we recognize that the learning goals will differ from the primarily text-based essay writing goals of the English course. In addition, large class size and other constraints make it impossible for faculty to adopt all aspects of the incremental approach. Thus, we ask: what is the impact of partial use of the approach and which aspects are most appropriate and feasible for use in other disciplines?
Team Leader:
Mark Maier / Economics
818-240-1000 x 5468 Fax: 818-549-9436
mmaier@glendale.edu
Team Members:
Sarah McLemore / English, Incremental-technology mentor
Lara Kartalian / English, Incremental-technology mentor
Paul Vera / ESL
Jennifer Krestow / Astronomy
Cameron Hastings / Political Science
Chris Juzwiak / English
Glendale Community College Proposal
Glendale College project plan, Feb. 26, 2009
Summary
A team of three Glendale College faculty members from ESL, Natural Sciences, and Social Sciences will use an incremental classroom to strengthen student outcomes.
Over the last few years, Chris Juzwiak has developed the incremental” approach for developmental English courses at Glendale Community College (see http://courseweb.glendale.edu/thefullemersion/) In brief, the incremental approach divides course learning goals into many small steps, engaging students in tasks using color-coded analyses of texts, daily homework, in-class small group work, and tasks repeated with less and less support, all building toward significant work such as a complete essay that experience has shown to be a difficult task for many students. These protocols are based on learning principles that recognize the importance of metacognition, immediate feedback, explicit instruction on expert-like thinking, varied visual and auditory prompts, and the sequencing of tasks based on Bloom’s taxonomy.
In adapting the incremental approach to other disciplines we recognize that the learning goals will differ from the primarily text-based essay writing goals of the English course. In addition, large class size and other constraints make it impossible for faculty to adopt all aspects of the incremental approach. Thus, we ask: what is the impact of partial use of the approach and which aspects are most appropriate and feasible for use in other disciplines?
Plans for Data Collection and Analysis
A. Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students
What data will you gather and analyze on individual students? (e.g. student work, self-reflections, interviews, videotaped think-alouds or problem-solving)
Spring 2009: The team members are now attending one unit (about three weeks) of English 120 courses taught by the English department mentors. The following data will be collected:
observations of students working in class
an initial survey to determine characteristics of students in the classes
interviews with five students chosen from each class by each team member
Fall 2009: Data on individual students will be collected by team members in their own courses. Method and techniques to be determined.
2) How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
In addition to learning about the incremental approach as a whole, each team member is examining student work and student viewpoints on the specific incremental technique chosen by the team member for adaptation to the new discipline.
3) When will you analyze this data? (e.g. mid-semester team retreat, after lesson-study session, at the end of the semester; )
Each team member will prepare a written report on the student data to be shared with the entire group. As the project proceeds, mentors will meet with team members to talk about what has been observed, and the entire team will meet to share what has been learned.
B. Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom
Please name ONE specific lesson in a particular course that will give you a good vantage point for observing student learning relevant to your Inquiry.
All team members are studying one unit (about three weeks) taught in the target English 120 course, Spring 2009.
How do you imagine the Lesson Study will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating about students and their learning? In other words, how does it connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
The unit was chosen because it highlights the possible benefits of the incremental approach: immediate student engagement in the course; breaking down of course content into manageable units; and immediate feedback to students about their progress.
When and how will your team conduct this Lesson Study? Please detail the timeframes and participants for the three parts of the Lesson Study process (collaboratively planning the lesson, teaching/observing the lesson, and debriefing/analyzing videotapes & student work from the lesson).
The observation portion of the lesson study will be complete by the third week of the semester (March 13). The follow-up interviews with students will continue in the next few weeks. Meetings with mentors and with the entire group will take place on a regular basis through March. By mid-semester (April 10), each team member will have completed a report on the lesson study, and will have chosen one aspect of the incremental approach to use in the new discipline.
4) What kinds of things will the observers be looking/listening for during the lesson? What artifacts of student learning and student experience will the team collect during the lesson? Will you videotape any portion of this process (pre-planning, lesson, debrief)?
We will videotape interaction between team members (entire group and with mentors). In addition, we will videotape team members about their project as it emerges so that there is a record of the process of project development.
C. Wide-Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data
What data from your Institutional Research Office will you integrate into your Inquiry? For example, will you look at patterns of student success, defined as grades of CR, A,B C? Retention rates (completion of semester without withdrawl)? Persistence from one semester to the next, or from one course to the next in a sequence? Comparisons of student outcomes disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, age? Data from surveys on student engagement? For a sample Inquiry using this kind of data, go to http://facultyinquiry.net and look for the category “Using Institutional Research,” then see the Learning Community Impact study posted there.)
None at this time. Considerable data is available on the incremental approach based on past semesters.
E. Inclusion of Student Voices
Each of the non-English instructors is now interviewing and videotaping students in English 120 using both common a common script as well as questions focusing on the likely project to be undertaken by that faculty member. The interviews will take place with individual students and in small focus groups.
Later in the semester, the non-English instructors will interview and videotape students in their own courses after the exploratory incremental approach is introduced. We anticipate that most the funds will be used to pay student co-inquirers in Fall 2009 when the incremental approach is used on a larger scale.
Timeline/Calendar
So that we can visualize how the work will proceed over the next several months, please give a timeline for when the above components will occur. It can be in either calendar or outline format.
Feb. 17 – March 10 Team members attend English 120 classes
March 10 – April 1 Interviews with students take place
March 10 – June 10 Videos of team members as project proceeds
By April 10 Team members prepare summary of findings and draft of plan for implementing the incremental approach in their own discipline.
April 20 – June 10 Team members design and test the use of the incremental approach for one concept in their own discipline.
Fall 2009 Incremental approach implement in new disciplines; student interviews take place; videos of student work and team member work.
By December 2009 Preparation by team members of 5-minute video documenting their work
About FIN
The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.
Registration for the conference is open, please register asap http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CQ2NQTQ. Conference registration cost is $50.00 for no...
I hope that all of you can attend the Umoja VI student run conference that is being assisted by FIN. The students have come up with many creative appr...
Click here to view:
FIN Leadership's Pre Conference Session, Exploring Inquiry: Ideas and Innovations from the Faculty Inquiry Network
Click here ...
One thing great teachers have in common, no matter what they teach, is skill. They make accommodating 30 or more different learning styles and mul...