Basic Skills in Complex Contexts

FIN Commons

College of the Siskiyous

Posted by Renata Funke on March 4, 2009 in Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Proposals with No Comments


College of the Siskiyous Mid-term Inquiry Update Video

College of the Siskiyous Movie

Revised Inquiry Plan

Revised Budget

College of the Siskiyous is focusing on the intersection between student learning and students’ identities as outsiders or insiders in the college environment. The Inquiry team will use video footage to capture student reflections and experiences, as well as classroom and athletic activities. One student group to be included are African-American student athletes adjusting to the isolation they find in the small rural community of Weed, California near the Oregon border. Another group will be students from a course called “Math for the Confused,” who will describe and analyze their experiences in the basic skills curriculum. By closely examining data on students’ performance and experiences, the Inquiry team aims to identify blind spots in the college’s approach to basic skills and, ultimately, find ways to “light the fire” in students with histories of low educational attainment.

Team Leader:
Renata Funke / Director, Yreka Campus
530-842-1245 Fax: 530-841-5221
funke@siskiyous.edu

Team Members:
Deborah Randolph / Math
Eve Thompson / English
Les Courtemanche / Football and Track assistant coach
Patrice Thatcher / ECE Program Coordinator
Catey Olivolo / Nursing
Mark Oliver / Videographer

College of the Siskiyous Proposal

College of Siskiyous Revised Inquiry Plan

Posted by Renata Funke on March 3, 2009 in Revised Inquiry Plans with No Comments


revised inquiry plan for Data collection and Analysis

A.        Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students

 

1)      What data will you gather and analyze on individual students? (e.g. student work, self-reflections, interviews, videotaped think-alouds or problem-solving)
Student interviews, self-reflections, and videotaped problem-solving; students participating in classroom activities or other activities, such as sports, possibly dramatizations of classroom activities.

 

2)   How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
It will help the instructor of the Leadership Training class define what he needs to know about his students, and what information and resources will help the students become more engaged in the class and more aware of decision-making and goal-setting processes.

 

3)      When and how will you collect this data? (e.g. Which classes will you target? Where will you conduct interviews or think-alouds?)
In March, students will be interviewed during or after three different classes, in 1) Social Psychology, 2) Intermediate Algebra, and 3) Leadership Training.  Interviews may also include other locations such as residence halls, and the campus at large; data will also be collected in the form of surveys, interviews, discussions, and written assignments.

 

4)      When will you analyze this data? (e.g. mid-semester team retreat, after lesson-study session, at the end of the semester;)
A mid-semester team retreat will analyze footage with issues debated by students from three classes, helping the instructor of the Leadership Training class define what changes he wants to make to his instructional practice, i.e. what additional information, methods, and resources need to be presented so students become more engaged and articulate better what helps them succeed.           

 

5)      How will you analyze the data? (e.g. analyzing student work with a rubric or analytic
rame like Polya’s method for problem-solving or Perry’s scheme for student development; analyzing themes in student self-reflections according to their performance in the class – how did the responses of students who did not pass compare/contrast with students who performed well?)
 Define levels of engagement and motivation as demonstrated by students in the Leadership Training class and correlate survey responses with grades and attendance records.

 

6)      What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your
 Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry?
 What would help Les understand better what his students need to become more engaged and motivated?

 

B.        Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom

 

1)      Please name ONE specific lesson in a particular course that will give you a good vantage point for observing student learning relevant to your Inquiry.

A Leadership Training lesson will focus on ways to overcome obstacles to college success in which students will dialog with data on intrinsic motivation presented by students from a Social Psychology class and with testimonials by students from an Intermediate Algebra class.

 

2)      How do you imagine the Lesson Study will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating about students and their learning? In other words, how does it connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?

After the lecture/discussion, students will write down what they observed about intrinsic/extrinsic motivation in the Math students, along with any new discoveries they have made on their own motivation levels.
It will inform and guide the inquiry into what helps students become more intrinsically motivated.

 

3)      When and how will your team conduct this Lesson Study? Please detail the timeframes
and participants for the three parts of the Lesson Study process (collaboratively planning the lesson, teaching/observing the lesson, and debriefing/analyzing videotapes & student work from the lesson).
 The team will decide on a timeline and protocol in March that will allow the videographer to tape a presentation by Social Psychology students in which they discuss their findings on intrinsic motivation, and student videographers to interview and tape students from an Intermediate Algebra class on their experiences and discoveries in their current and previous Math classes.  
The team will also work with the instructor of the Leadership Training class who is preparing to teach a unit on decision-making processes and intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, Students will reflect on what they have viewed, both during class and following class, with a written assignment; members of the FIN team will observe students during the lesson and analyze footage and student work during the debrief.

 

 

4)       What kinds of things will the observers be looking/listening for during the lesson? What artifacts of student learning and student experience will the team collect during the lesson? Will you videotape any portion of this process (pre-planning, lesson, debrief)?

The observers will focus on questions asked, issues brought up, general group dynamics, and how students understood the lesson, as reported in their follow-up assignment. 

 

 

5) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your
      Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry?
     Specific methods to elicit student reactions and define student learning on intrinsic
     vs. extrinsic motivation.

 

 

C.        Wide-Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data

 

1)   What data from your Institutional Research Office will you integrate into your Inquiry? For example, will you look at patterns of student success, defined as grades of CR, A, B C? Retention rates (completion of semester without withdrawal)? Persistence from one semester to the next, or from one course to the next in a sequence? Comparisons of student outcomes disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, age? Data from surveys on student engagement? For a sample Inquiry using this kind of data, go to http://facultyinquiry.net and look for the category “Using Institutional Research,” then see the Learning Community Impact study posted there.)
The focus will be on certain questions asked in the CCSSE and/or SENSE, possibly followed by a future iteration of the CCSSE that could correlate the GUID 10 class on Leadership Training with survey responses.

 

 

2)   How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
How do findings by the instructor of the Leadership Training class add to the debate on how to help students become more intrinsically motivated?  What other factors, including the rural culture, need to be examined? Do faculty and student support services need to include a different perspective on students?  Does the mission of the college need to reflect the students’ perspectives more?

 

 

3)   What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry?
Who else to engage on campus, including the new president’s visioning committee and Student Services.

 

D.  Video Footage

We are asking each team to collect at least 10 hours of video footage in the Spring semester.

 

1)   Beyond plans detailed above, please describe any additional footage you intend to gather.
Students who will be videotaped while presenting findings, dialoguing with footage, and reflecting on their own experiences, may be followed into other classes or captured during extra-curricular activities. Given the fact that the video has been a key element from the inception of the COS project, there may be close to 50 hours of video filmed.

 

2)      How will this footage inform the central questions of your Inquiry?
It will answer questions on how the college give students a voice and support their developing identity, and how instructors can improve their ability to reach students in the classroom and beyond.

 

 

3)   What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? Is there any support you’d like from the FIN Leadership Team in this area?
What additional components should be included in the COS inquiry, as suggested by other colleges?

 

E.         Inclusion of Student Voices

 

As noted during the Kick-Off Convening, an additional $1,000 will be made available to each team to support making student voices a central part of each Inquiry. We encourage you to be creative and draw upon students as co-inquirers who can provide expertise in helping you understand the problem/issue you are investigating. Please describe how you plan to include student voices in your Inquiry (e.g. hiring students to capture video footage, interview other students, review data from your inquiry and tell you what they see).
Student videographers will tape and review data and be given an opportunity to interpret and expand upon the data.

 

Timeline/Calendar

So that we can visualize how the work will proceed over the next several months, please give a timeline for when the above components will occur. It can be in either calendar or outline format.

 

Early March:
Defining a protocol for/videotaping of Social Psychology class presentation and interviews with Math students, and possibly student athletes.

 

Spring Break mid March:
Brainstorming with Les Courtemanche on what to include in Leadership Training lesson, including a written assignment.

 

Early April:
Taping Leadership Training lesson and debrief.

 

Mid/End April:
Presenting footage to all other team members and the FIN coach; brainstorming on research data needed and which students to showcase in other activities.

 

End April/early May:
Mark, Les, Renata, and other FIN team members view footage and help Mark define focus of initial video and/or guide subsequent research and inquiry activities.

 

 

Revised Budget, College of the Siskiyous

Posted by Renata Funke on February 26, 2009 in FIN Grant Logistics, Proposals with No Comments


Revised Budget 2009
College of the Siskiyous

Faculty Stipends: 25 hours @$48 $1,200

Student Co-Inquirers: 250 hous @ $10 $2,500

Classified/Tech Assistance: 288 hours @ $40 11,500

Benefits: $57.00

Supplies and Equipment: $2,400

Team Retreats/Inhouse Conferences: $400

Other, incl. student stipend payments: $400

Total 18,457

Summary College of the Siskiyous

Posted by Renata Funke on February 26, 2009 in Developing Questions, Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Fear, Identity, Learning to Learn, Making Visible, Math, Metacognition, Pre/Post, Proposals, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Teams, Student Voice, Surveys, Teaching Problem Solving, Using Institutional Research, Video Evidence with No Comments


College of the Siskiyous is focusing on what helps students become more intrinsically motivated as they navigate the intersection between student learning and students’ identities as outsiders or insiders in the college environment. The Inquiry team will use video footage to capture student reflections and experiences, as well as classroom discussions and athletic activities. One student group to be included are African-American student athletes adjusting to the isolation they find in the small rural community of Weed, California near the Oregon border. Another group will be students of Math who started at the college with Pre-Algebra and who are currently enrolled in Intermediate Algebra from a course called “Math for the Confused,” who will describe and analyze their experiences and what helped them succeed in their math courses. A group of students from a Leadership Training class will dialog with a group from a Social Psychology class to explore ways students can become intrinsically motivated. By closely examining data on students’ performance and experiences, the Inquiry team aims to identify blind spots in the college’s approach to basic skills and, ultimately, find ways to “light the fire” in students with histories of low educational attainment.

Team Leader:
Renata Funke / Director, Yreka Campus
530-842-1245 Fax: 530-841-5221
funke@siskiyous.edu

Team Members:
Les Courtemanche / Football/Track assistant coach/instructor of a Leadership Training class
Deborah Randolph / Math instructor of a “Math for the Confused” class (pre-pre-algebra level)
Eve Thompson / English
Patrice Thatcher / ECE Program Coordinator
Catey Olivolo / Nursing
Mark Oliver / Videography

About FIN

The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.

  • Recent Post

  • Tag Cloud