Basic Skills in Complex Contexts

FIN Commons

Marvin and Raul pairwork

Posted by Sonja Franeta on November 12, 2009 in Basic Skills in Context, Career Technical Education, Integrative Learning, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Performance Assessment, Student Teams, Student Voice, Think Alouds, Video Evidence with No Comments


An example of contextualized learning, using the think aloud method–student takes time to produce the words he is looking to express. Teacher coaches and other student helps. The student then uses motions in the repetition of recalled expression.
Marvin and Raul pairwork

LPC–Talking to Our Students

Posted by Katie on May 14, 2009 in Developing Questions, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Teams, Student Voice, Video Evidence with No Comments


April has seen our video team (Mass. Comm. students, aided by team member Michelle Gonzales and Mass. Comm. instructor Jin Tsubota) jumping into student interviews and filming.   May has added on our English basic skills student co-inquirers, who are recording oral interviews with students currently in the basic skills program.  I have uploaded our questions to the media library so that you all can poach them–it has been *so* valuable to hear what our students have to say to student interviewers!  Finally, our counselor team member, Nancy Wright, has been calling students who have dropped and asking them a series of questions.  A few of the students she called walked right over to her office and got some very valuable help!  She wishes she could make a personal connection with every student.  I have uploaded Nancy’s questions to the media library as well.  All questions were drafted with the help of our student co-inquirers and the two student filmmakers.

Student Team at BCC

Posted by Scott Hoshida on April 25, 2009 in FIN Grant Logistics, Learning to Learn, Student Teams, Student Voice, Uncategorized with 5 Comments


STUDENT TEAM DEVELOPMENT:
When first encouraged by the FIN staff to work with students on this project, it seemed to be a logical, if not difficult, choice. Students who live and breathe the lessons that we teach, or attempt to teach, should be both the subjects of our research and our co-pilots. Of course, the actual implementation of a team has become a little more difficult.

Originally, at the core of our project was the idea to tape classes, interviews, and focus groups, each built to inform the next in a spiral-like fashion that sounds much more orderly than the actual process involved. The neatness of the proposal, however, is much more difficult as more minds focus on our question of how storytelling (sharing, writing, speaking, etc.) can impact student motivation and metacognition.

We’ve finally been able to employ two students with a third has decided not to participate. One is a re-entry student who had successfully moved herself up the ladder of English classes and now is taking a critical thinking course in preparation to transfer in the next year or two. The second is a student who has started a film club on campus and is hoping to be a film major at UCLA or SF State.

In organizing this team, I thought it best to bring the team in at ground zero: brainstorming, organizing ideas, matching it to a work plan in the same way that we developed our plan to give them a sense of how we started this project and to get their input on how to move forward. I also met with our Multimedia Studies Dept. Chair who we’ll be working with in the upcoming semesters for sound room/video room time. She also recommended a course or two that students (and teachers) ought to take to familiarize themselves with video making terminology and equipment.

After taping our first focus group and our initial meetings (time sheets, hiring, and other logistics), we decided that we’re going to focus on the students who participated in the focus groups, try to tape more of the lesson plan in Cleavon’s class (if scheduling permits) and roll out an informal interview process on our question.

The students also brought up some great ideas:
- Interview support staff (counselors, EOPS folks, etc.)
- Have our student team interview the FIN teachers (this I think would be great)
- Try to understand not only the intent of our question, but how lessons around storytelling/sharing actually are framed and taught by various teachers (not just FIN teachers).

We just set a schedule to review some tape, do our first interviews, and hopefully everything will start to come together soon.

This is definitely a work-in-progress that’s evolving as we go!

Students as Co-inquirers- Thoughts from a former student inquirer

Posted by Jamie Chandler on February 26, 2009 in Making Visible, Student Teams, Student Voice with 1 Comment


Students as Co-inquirers: Thoughts from a former student inquirer


Rummaging through my computer, I found some stuff from my student researcher days.  Students as co-inquirers interpret student intakes differently than teachers. The making visible crew and I were able to see beyond the words on paper because we know what students do, when they are making excuses, fearing authority or lacking self-confidence. We were going through the exact same things. Students as co-inquirers are incredibly resourceful in interpreting student data and in educational reform.

Remember, student researchers don’t have to be enrolled in the class they are studying. In fact our making visible team was composed of four determined poets who had taken a few classes together. We often brought in our friends, class mates, or entire classrooms that we thought would add to our content, or fill gaps in our movies. And what a great experience it was for us! Now here I am, former student researcher, encouraging you to use students to assist you in your inquiry.

Here’s an example of the work we started with for our first project in 2005: reading and typing 150 student intake essays on the question, “what’s your relationship with reading,” pulling out themes, common threads and concepts. Our motto: When in doubt, grab the camera!

Happy Inquiry!

_______________________________________________________________________

101A (one below entry level english) Trends

1. Re-reading

  • Believe that they shouldn’t have to re-read the text/novel
  • That it makes them read slower and the processes is drown out
  • On the contrary, students admit that more reading only improves their skills.
  • In conclusion, the students are discouraged and frustrated by this factor, and thus tend to not enjoy reading.
  • They then feel alone in the situation.
  • From my own experience, I know that EVERYONE has to read and re-read in order to truly understand the text.
  • My solution to this is learning how to actively read. Writing notes in the margins, reading at least twice, finding the main idea, discussions, applying the concept, etc.

2. Interest

  • The students only want to read things that interest them or directly relate, which I believe is a natural instinct.
  • However, it leads them to be biased against certain areas of literature, such as poetry, texts, etc.
  • Thus staying inside their own box and not exposing themselves to their ideas, environments, vocabulary words, cultures, etc.
  • “My point of view you won’t learn anything you’re not interested in or like it…”
  • Yet, a handful of students, both readers and non-readers, admit that reading improves your knowledge, vocab, and yourself.
  • My conclusion is that these students are perhaps afraid of the unknown.
  • Or maybe they have an authority issue, and don’t like taking orders or assignments from instructors that they don’t know and respect or that aren’t themselves.
  • The solution: maybe having instructors introduce themselves; their interests, credentials, their experiences as a student, where they are from, whatever, in order to expose the students to their instructor.
  • Maybe that would wipe away they fear and intimidation by some of the students, making them more comfortable to open themselves up.
  • I don’t really know how to fix the fear of the unknown, I think it’s a natural feeling and that its an individual battle.

Overall Conclusion

  • It seems that the trends are predictable in this 101A class.
  • Their ideas are somewhat based on their skill level and exposure.
  • Even though the trends tend to be similar, there are different situations, excuses, and examples. (Some being more interesting than others)

Interesting Comments and Response

1.

  • Enjoys reading newspapers and novels only.
  • Has a negative attitude towards textbooks.
  • States that text books are for learning only and one should pay attention to the author’s opinion and purpose.
  • My question is, shouldn’t we always look for the author’s bias and purpose? And especially in novels and newspapers!!
  • A reader should always ask themselves questions, or question the author’s statements.

2.

  • Dyslexia without good teaching: it held her back greatly, being at a fifth to sixth grade level in High School.
  • Thus was discouraged early and learned to hate reading
  • This, I believe caused her to have a low self esteem
  • And once a teacher exposed her to techniques of reading, gave her attention and confidence, she was encouraged to read and now she can’t stop! Despite its difficulty.
  • My question to her would be, how long did you go without being diagnosed?
  • How did you feel in those degrading ‘special ed classes?’
  • Did any one else try to reach out to you? Or did everyone just ignore your severe disability?

3.

  • Didn’t read a book until the last year of H.S and believes that short stories are better because they are short.
  • Can only read if there is some sort of background distraction- does that truly help the info stick?
  • Refers to self as ‘kids nowadays’ –Maybe suggests a low self esteem.
  • Grammar is poor: a reflection of not reading and paying attention in school.
  • Question: How did you graduate high school without ever reading the books?
  • “hard to get kids to read because they are used to having everything done for them”
  • Is that quote a sort of cop out? An excuse to give up and not even try? To just continue to be a lazy student scarping by?

4.

  • “if I want a lengthy build up to a great ending then I’ll watch a movie, that takes far less time invested”
  • Isn’t a ‘reader’
  • Wants the quick fix
  • Never finished a book in H.S- didn’t anyone notice? How did he pass?
  • Says that no book is of interest because he doesn’t like to read and is unable to make himself relate in novels and texts.
  • Don’t you think that you aren’t a reader because you didn’t read as a young child when your brain and skills are still developing?
  • Do you feel cheated or guilty?
  • “I could almost guarantee the amount of pleasure reading declines with each generation”
  • Why do you think that is? Because of the young students like you who want the quick fix, movies, technology, caring only about the self and the self’s interests?

Summary College of the Siskiyous

Posted by Renata Funke on February 26, 2009 in Developing Questions, Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Fear, Identity, Learning to Learn, Making Visible, Math, Metacognition, Pre/Post, Proposals, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Teams, Student Voice, Surveys, Teaching Problem Solving, Using Institutional Research, Video Evidence with No Comments


College of the Siskiyous is focusing on what helps students become more intrinsically motivated as they navigate the intersection between student learning and students’ identities as outsiders or insiders in the college environment. The Inquiry team will use video footage to capture student reflections and experiences, as well as classroom discussions and athletic activities. One student group to be included are African-American student athletes adjusting to the isolation they find in the small rural community of Weed, California near the Oregon border. Another group will be students of Math who started at the college with Pre-Algebra and who are currently enrolled in Intermediate Algebra from a course called “Math for the Confused,” who will describe and analyze their experiences and what helped them succeed in their math courses. A group of students from a Leadership Training class will dialog with a group from a Social Psychology class to explore ways students can become intrinsically motivated. By closely examining data on students’ performance and experiences, the Inquiry team aims to identify blind spots in the college’s approach to basic skills and, ultimately, find ways to “light the fire” in students with histories of low educational attainment.

Team Leader:
Renata Funke / Director, Yreka Campus
530-842-1245 Fax: 530-841-5221
funke@siskiyous.edu

Team Members:
Les Courtemanche / Football/Track assistant coach/instructor of a Leadership Training class
Deborah Randolph / Math instructor of a “Math for the Confused” class (pre-pre-algebra level)
Eve Thompson / English
Patrice Thatcher / ECE Program Coordinator
Catey Olivolo / Nursing
Mark Oliver / Videography

About FIN

The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.

  • Recent Post

  • Tag Cloud