Posted by Renata Funke on February 26, 2009 in Developing Questions, Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Fear, Identity, Learning to Learn, Making Visible, Math, Metacognition, Pre/Post, Proposals, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Teams, Student Voice, Surveys, Teaching Problem Solving, Using Institutional Research, Video Evidence with No Comments
College of the Siskiyous is focusing on what helps students become more intrinsically motivated as they navigate the intersection between student learning and students’ identities as outsiders or insiders in the college environment. The Inquiry team will use video footage to capture student reflections and experiences, as well as classroom discussions and athletic activities. One student group to be included are African-American student athletes adjusting to the isolation they find in the small rural community of Weed, California near the Oregon border. Another group will be students of Math who started at the college with Pre-Algebra and who are currently enrolled in Intermediate Algebra from a course called “Math for the Confused,” who will describe and analyze their experiences and what helped them succeed in their math courses. A group of students from a Leadership Training class will dialog with a group from a Social Psychology class to explore ways students can become intrinsically motivated. By closely examining data on students’ performance and experiences, the Inquiry team aims to identify blind spots in the college’s approach to basic skills and, ultimately, find ways to “light the fire” in students with histories of low educational attainment.
Team Leader:
Renata Funke / Director, Yreka Campus
530-842-1245 Fax: 530-841-5221
funke@siskiyous.edu
Team Members:
Les Courtemanche / Football/Track assistant coach/instructor of a Leadership Training class
Deborah Randolph / Math instructor of a “Math for the Confused” class (pre-pre-algebra level)
Eve Thompson / English
Patrice Thatcher / ECE Program Coordinator
Catey Olivolo / Nursing
Mark Oliver / Videography
Tags: classroom discussions, college environment, college of the siskiyous, ece program, educational attainment, football track, inquiry team, intermediate algebra, leadership training, math courses, math instructor, oregon border, pre algebra, psychology class, small rural community, social psychology, student reflections, weed california
Posted by Sean McFarland on February 21, 2009 in Making Visible, Multimedia, Student Interviews, Student Voice, Surveys, Think Alouds, Video Evidence with 1 Comment
There are many ways to capture Student Voices. We hope the list below offers some starting points for you and your team. We will add to this list as we begin to hear other ideas from FIN teams.
- Faculty interviews student .
- Student interviews student.
- Student interviews herself—self-reflection.
- Roundtable—group of students discuss issues put before them.
- Think-alouds. Student is filmed as she works through a problem taken from her class, all the while talking about why she is making the choices she is making. With this strategy, the student’s meta-cognitive state is revealed.
- Collaborative problem solving. Similar to Think-alouds, but with more than one student engaged in the task.
- Students of course can be filmed in the class setting, working in groups, responding to the instructor, etc. With this strategy you may run into issues around getting good sound. One tip is to, whenever possible, get the camera in close to whomever is speaking.
- Of course, any time you ask students in a class setting to generate content that you can later analyze as part of your Inquiry, you are uncovering Student Voices. For example, having students do in-take self-assessments, or written self-reflections, or classroom assessments, etc.–all of these tools reveal Student Voices.
Types of interviews:
- One-on-one.
- Duo interviews, in which 2 students are on camera.
- Group interviews.
- “Man in the Street” –actually should be called “Student in the Street” interviews. Students are esp. good at conducting these. These kinds of “quick hitting” interviews can actually serve as good starting points for Inquiry. They of course can tend to be anecdotal in nature, and may not deliver hard data, but they do sometimes uncover areas of interest that Inquirers may not have considered.
Posted by Katie Hern on February 18, 2009 in Literacy, Metacognition, Pre/Post, Reading, Surveys with 1 Comment
The attached article from the Journal of Educational Psychology includes a useful survey instrument for assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of their own reading strategies. This easy-to-use tool provides feedback to both students and faculty about how students are approaching their academic reading. The survey and scoring rubric are included in the appendix.
Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies