The Case for Acceleration in Developmental English and Math
Exponential Attrition and the Promise of Acceleration
Katie Hern and Myra Snell recently collaborated to create an article for the RP Group’s statewide newsletter Perspectives. The article argues that high rates of student attrition are structurally guaranteed in long developmental sequences and presents evidence from Chabot and Los Medanos colleges that one-semester, open-access courses are a promising way to increase student completion rates in college-level English and Math. The full article is linked above.
Barriers to Research at the Campus Level
Skyline College’s process of inquiry has proven to be a wonderful collaborative effort that has great support from faculty, students, and administrators. You’d think that the campus research approval committee would be the last barrier to our success, and like us, you’d have another “think” coming. We are interested to know if any other colleges have experienced difficulty in getting their research committee to agree to the research parameters of the inquiry projects.
Skyline’s FIN group had no idea what was in store when we presented our proposal. We were given a 9-page packet of protocols and instructions from our research committee. The informed consent page template alone had 11 points to it, and there were over 40 numbered steps and clearances that we had to surmount before being approved. We dove in with aplomb, and got the proposal kicked back to us. Most of all, they were concerned that the video process would endanger student privacy and felt that students were being put at undue risk of unprotected identity (despite an informed consent clause stating that pseudonyms would be used and permission signatures would be obtained).
We were shocked to confront this, mainly because we are pretty sure that we aren’t the first research group to use video (!). After much emailing among our FIN group, we rewrote our proposal, and now, we wait to see what the committee’s response is. Meanwhile, our research hovers in the near future, waiting for the flag to drop so we can speed towards it. If anyone else has had such experiences with their research committee, we’d be interested to know how you dealt with it. FIN would do well to consider this potential snag prior to future inquiry projects so that they can provide the appropriate support to groups to help them get their research off the ground.
INQUIRING MINDS: Faculty Inquiry in Basic Skills Contexts

This 15 minute film offers an introduction to the iterative steps that underlie effective Faculty Inquiry. The film lays out four steps:
1. What Do We See?
2. How Can We See It Better?
3. How Can We Share It With Others?
4. Now That We See It, What Can We Do About It?
INQUIRING MINDS is designed as a resource for those who are engaged in Faculty Inquiry, and for those who would like to gain a better understanding of its promise.
The creation of INQUIRING MINDS was generously supported by:
SPECC (Strengthening Pre-collegiate Education in Community Colleges), a joint project of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Los Medanos College/English: Revised Inquiry Plan
A. Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students
1) What data will you gather and analyze on individual students? (e.g. student work, self-reflections, interviews, videotaped think-alouds or problem-solving)
In the first two weeks of class, we asked the students to fill out a reading survey. Among other things, the survey asked them to identify “texts” they read outside of school (such as magazines, newspapers, websites, etc).
We are also creating in-class goal groups that will meet at least six times during the semester. There is some variation in what each instructor will ask the goal work to focus on (for example, one instructor is asking students to create goals focused on the course SLOs, while others are more focused on personal as well as academic goals). As part of this work, students are asked to write reflective paragraphs at the end of each goal group session.
2) How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
One focus of our inquiry is how to more successfully engage African American students in Engl 70 by using more culturally relevant reading materials. In order to do this, we need to know what it is students are reading outside of school, so that we can integrate more culturally relevant material, both in terms of content as well as style.
Another focus of our inquiry is that of greater engagement. As a part of that focus, we plan to help students focus on goals that will help them succeed. Their reflections about this process will be invaluable.
3) When and how will you collect this data? (e.g. Which classes will you target? Where will you conduct interviews or think-alouds?)
The reading surveys were collected during the first two weeks of class. The reflective paragraphs will be collected after each goal group section.
4) When will you analyze this data? (e.g. mid-semester team retreat, after lesson-study session, at the end of the semester )
We haven’t determined that yet, but it will be before the end of May so that we can make needed curricular changes for the Fall 2009 semester.
5.) How will you analyze the data?
We don’t have a set plan for this analysis. It’s safe to assume that all four team members, as well as the two other Engl 70 instructors involved, will read both the surveys and the paragraphs and discuss any themes or patterns that they observe.
Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom
1) Please name ONE specific lesson in a particular course that will give you a good vantage point for observing student learning relevant to your Inquiry.
The lesson we will focus on is helping students apply the concepts introduced in Martin Luther King’s “Three Ways of Meeting Oppression” to the memoir Warriors Don’t Cry and to their own life experience. This is a departure from the more standard academic prompt we have used in the past with this memoir, and we hope it will more directly engage students as they reflect on how they choose to respond to perceived and actual oppression in their lives.
2) How do you imagine the Lesson Study will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating about students and their learning? In other words, how does it connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?
This lesson will help us to observe the reaction of our African -American students to culturally relevant readings and pedagogy. We have intentionally revised the usual essay prompt for Warriors Don’t Cry in order to bring in students’ experiences and perspectives on responding to oppression.
3) When and how will your team conduct this Lesson Study? Please detail the timeframes and participants for the three parts of the Lesson Study process (collaboratively planning the lesson, teaching/observing the lesson, and debriefing/analyzing videotapes & student work from the lesson).
This lesson study is a collaboration between two English 70 faculty: Katalina Wethington and Nancy Ybarra
- Part 1: We met to plan the essay prompt and the supplemental readings during week 6.
- Part 2: We plan to teach and observe the lesson after students finish reading the memoir, but prior to introducing the essay assignment. (Between weeks 8 and 12)
- Part 3: We will meet between weeks 15 and 17 to discuss and analyze observations about our teaching of the lesson. We will also discuss the extent to which students were able to apply the concepts in the article to the book and their own life experiences in the essay.
4) What kinds of things will the observers be looking/listening for during the lesson? What artifacts of student learning and student experience will the team collect during the lesson? Will you videotape any portion of this process (pre-planning, lesson, debrief)?
During the lesson we will look for ways in which the instructor encourages students to:
- Make text to self connections.
- Make text to text connections.
- Engage with other students and the subject matter.
- Deepen their comprehension of the concepts contained in the article and apply them in multiple contexts.
- We will not videotape any portion of this process.
- We will collect student essays, summaries of the article, and student reflections on their own experiences with oppression.
- We will write reflections on our teaching of the lesson and our perceptions of student response.
5) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry?
- We are not ready for the cameras.
- Is the article too difficult for the students? Will they comprehend it?
- Will those students who have not experienced oppression still be engaged?
- What is the most effective way to help the students synthesize the article, the memoir and their own experiencees
Wide Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data
1) What data from your Institutional Research Office will you integrate into your Inquiry?
- We are keeping track of attendance and drop patterns of all students in our four pilot sections in Spring 2009, and will specifically target those of African American students starting in Fall 2009. In order to do so, we have requested the student data for the four sections disaggregated by ethnicity, age, and gender.
- Each of the four instructors is sending the team leader the student IDs of students who appear to have dropped the course (or at least are no longer attending).
- The team leader is sending out form letters to those students, asking them for feedback about if they have dropped the course, and if so, why. The students do not have to fill out any personal information on the letters. Those letters include a SASE addressed to the team leader, so that we may collect data about the stories behind students’ choices.
- We will also be looking at persistence patterns after the first semester, disaggregated by the same categories as above (as well as by stated goals, if recorded)
- We will also be analyzing student pass rates
- As part of the Engl 70 curriculum, students are required to see an academic counselor and create an educational plan. The Developmental Education Committee has already started a research project examining how this requirement influences student persistence. We will use this data as part of our look at persistence.
2) How will this data help?
In contrast to the classroom and student-focused data, which will help us understand the student experience and student perception of our work on engagement and culturally relevant pedagogy and their influence on retention and success for African American students, this look at the numbers will give us, first of all, a baseline from which to measure our work. Secondly, it will allow us to make some comparative evaluations of the pilot sections vs the other stand-alone sections. The numbers are in no way the whole story, but they are an important part of the story.
Our goal in this grant is to create and refine methods that can be used by all Engl 70 instructors, regardless of their commitment to equity perspectives, their status in the institution, and their commitments elsewhere, to increase the retention and success rates of African American students in Engl 70. To that end, the methods we ultimately recommend to the Engl dept must be efficient, cost-effective, easily incorporated into the curriculum, and usable by adjunct faculty members, who teach at least 70% of the Engl 70 sections.
In order to make these kinds of sweeping programmatic suggestions, our efforts have to be reflected in the retention, persistence, and success rate figures for the course for all four sections. So a close monitoring and evaluation of those numbers is essential to our goal.
Questions and Concerns:
- Will the numbers and the student perceptions match each other?
- What if none of the students who drop mail back the letters?
- Will any of the numerical data be meaningful enough to warrant changes in curriculum and pedagogy for all Engl 70 instructors?
Timeline for Spring 2009

REVISED BUDGET

College of Alameda Plans for Data Collection and Analysis
A. Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students
1) What data will you gather and analyze on individual students? (e.g. student work, self-reflections, interviews, videotaped think-aloud’s or problem-solving) All the above.
2) How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry? Some team members feel that we should narrow our focus of basic skills and not include all basic skills, as the scope of basic skills overall is too broad. If we are to approach this issue in this fashion, then we have to first determine what areas the students are most needy in.
3) When and how will you collect this data? (e.g. Which classes will you target? Where will you conduct interviews or think-alouds?) DMECH 15 (Lecture class) DMECH 21B (Lab class). This semester.
4) When will you analyze this data? (e.g. mid-semester team retreat, after lesson-study session, at the end of the semester; ) Team retreat in June 09.
5.) How will you analyze the data? (e.g. analyzing student work with a rubric or analytic frame like Polya’s method for problem-solving or Perry’s scheme for student development; analyzing themes in student self-reflections according to their performance in the class – how did the responses of students who did not pass compare/contrast with students who performed well?) Through analyzing student video interview self-reflection and hands-on performance video’s with student’s using think-aloud’s, we can see what type of learners individuals are. We will also use multiple intelligences assessment to add additional data. We will be looking for commonalities in order to address the most pressing needs of the student’s.
6) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry? To help us formulate questions for student interviews.
B. Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom
1) Please name ONE specific lesson in a particular course that will give you a good vantage point for observing student learning relevant to your Inquiry. The Chemistry of Combustion
2) How do you imagine the Lesson Study will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating about students and their learning? In other words, how does it connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry? This lesson includes vocabulary, reading comprehension, critical thinking and report writing. This lesson will demonstrate students basic skills in this area.
3) When and how will your team conduct this Lesson Study? Please detail the timeframes and participants for the three parts of the Lesson Study process (collaboratively planning the lesson, teaching/observing the lesson, and debriefing/analyzing videotapes & student work from the lesson). Near the end of this semester; the lesson will be lectured on May 5, 09. It will be analyzed during the June retreat.
4) What kinds of things will the observers be looking/listening for during the lesson? What artifacts of student learning and student experience will the team collect during the lesson? Will you videotape any portion of this process (pre-planning, lesson, debrief)? We will generate an “observation form” so that we all agree on the kind of data we are looking for. We will each assume a different observation role to ascertain different kinds of data, e.g. math, team skills, critical thinking, language.
5) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry? We will look for coaches to help us keep focused on our inquiry and keep moving in the right direction.
C. Wide-Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data
1) What data from your Institutional Research Office will you integrate into your Inquiry? For example, will you look at patterns of student success, defined as grades of CR, A,B C? Retention rates (completion of semester without withdrawl)? Persistence from one semester to the next, or from one course to the next in a sequence? Comparisons of student outcomes disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, age? Data from surveys on student engagement? For a sample Inquiry using this kind of data, go to http://facultyinquiry.net and look for the category “Using Institutional Research,” then see the Learning Community Impact study posted there.) We will make an upcoming appointment within the next month to accomplish this goal with our college Institutional Research Specialist.
2) How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry? It will help us to realize trends that we may not now know.
3) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry? Inquiring of the coach what kind of data was researched at other institutions and may help in determining relevancy for what data we should include or look for.
D. Video Footage
We are asking each team to collect at least 10 hours of video footage in the Spring semester.
1) Beyond plans detailed above, please describe any additional footage you intend to gather.
We have already started by gathering video by filming students participating in hands-on projects. We will continue to do this. We will also be filming students in interviews and self-reflection exercises while tasking assignments. We will also record video in team interaction and planning.
2) How will this footage inform the central questions of your Inquiry?
It will be the basis for analyzing our inquiry.
3) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? Is there any support you’d like from the FIN Leadership Team in this area? How will this video process affect the behavior of participants? I’m sure there will be inquiries from time to time on process and collection.
E. Inclusion of Student Voices
As noted during the Kick-Off Convening, an additional $1,000 will be made available to each team to support making student voices a central part of each Inquiry. We encourage you to be creative and draw upon students as co-inquirers who can provide expertise in helping you understand the problem/issue you are investigating. Please describe how you plan to include student voices in your Inquiry (e.g. hiring students to capture video footage, interview other students, review data from your inquiry and tell you what they see). We feel that we should include one student who is not basic skills challenged and one student who is. This will help us to determine need and direction for this inquiry as far as basic skills inclusion is concerned.
Timeline/Calendar
So that we can visualize how the work will proceed over the next several months, please give a timeline for when the above components will occur. It can be in either calendar or outline format.
|
March: Video -Initial Student Assessment, -Meet with IR Officer
|
April: Video -Collaborative lesson planning & observation form development |
May: Video -Lesson observation & preliminary analysis |
June- Video Retreat & data analysis |
About FIN
The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.
Registration for the conference is open, please register asap http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CQ2NQTQ. Conference registration cost is $50.00 for no...
I hope that all of you can attend the Umoja VI student run conference that is being assisted by FIN. The students have come up with many creative appr...
Click here to view:
FIN Leadership's Pre Conference Session, Exploring Inquiry: Ideas and Innovations from the Faculty Inquiry Network
Click here ...
One thing great teachers have in common, no matter what they teach, is skill. They make accommodating 30 or more different learning styles and mul...