Berkeley City College Summary of Inquiry
Posted by Scott Hoshida on February 27, 2009 in Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), FIN Grant Logistics, Identity, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Metacognition, Proposals, Revised Inquiry Plans, Student Confidence, Uncategorized with 2 Comments
ANSWERS TO FIN QUESTIONS:
A. Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students
The team will gather student data in four ways: one-on-one interviews (on camera and informally); student writing assignments that demonstrate both autobiographical narratives and metacognitive reflection; video taping classroom discussions; and a small focus group, which will provide us feedback on our inquiry questions, process, and analysis. We hope to better understand the confidence with which students develop their own narratives around educational success and failure, develop metacognitive reflection and planning skills, and shift their identities in relationship to their own learning.
In order to frame this inquiry, the team will develop a rubric that will be used to evaluate student narratives and metacognition in their writing and spoken communication to understand if a focus on student identity, autobiographical writing, and metacognition changes their ability to transfer skills and confidence to other classrooms and into their lives.
The timing of analysis will be ongoing. At each stage of the inquiry, the team will make adjustments to the collection schedule and instruments. For instance, after video taping our lesson plan, we have been working on making sure our classroom surveys measure three things: metacognition, locus of control (self-efficacy/self-confidence), and other measures of classroom engagement. At the end the of the semester, we will have a retreat with our student inquiry team to evaluate the information that we’ve collected to make a schedule for the following semester and evaluate what we’ve learned.
Questions: We’ve set up a data collection schedule that we hope to fulfill. Whether or not we’re able to analyze and understand it might be much more difficult. Any thoughts?
B. Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom
The lesson study will focus on the presentation and discussion of Joseph Campbell’s the Hero’s and Heroine’s Journey. After a lecture and discussion of this framework, students will take a look at their own writing to see how it matches up to the Hero’s Journey. Hopefully, as we tape these discussions, we’ll have a chance to see if this framework helps students see a link between their own journey and story with a broader story of overcoming obstacles. In addition, the lesson teacher will develop a rubric with those students to determine the quality of their story. We’ve already taped the planning of that lesson and the first class for this lesson study. While taping the class, we found that students did not want to share in front of the camera, and we are worried that it might feel invasive and cause students to feel vulnerable. Even though we had scheduled a second classroom shoot, we missed that day, but will try to return after students complete the assignment.
Ideally, we would like to pull students aside and have them narrate their thoughts on connecting their narratives to the Hero’s Journey, sharing their own stories, and thinking about how to develop authentic autobiographical narratives that help them examine their lives more closely. With such sensitive and personal information, it seems that it might be difficult to videotape students in the midst of this process, but we might be able to conduct pre and post discussions with them. Once we finish taping the video and look at the student work to develop a rubric, then we’ll sit down to analyze the data.
C. Wide-Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data
We will gather institutional data on grades, writing assessments, persistence, and possibly administer the survey to students taking transfer-level classes. We would like to track down students who started in English 269 and have moved past English 1A to understand what helped them successfully move through the required classes.
D. Video Footage
In addition to the footage taken in class, we will conduct at least one focus group this semester with about 10 students (3 students from 3 classes) to help us better frame the questions for our inquiries and to test our assumptions. The focus group will be videotaped, and hopefully these students will agree to be interviewed in one-on-one on tape for more discussion on the project. Also, we hope to tape our day of reflection or retreat where we will analyze the data gathered and begin planning for next semester.
E. Inclusion of Student Voices
We will use students to help videotape each section of our inquiry, work with them to edit our tapes, and use our team to shape our inquiry. In addition, the focus groups will provide students in our class a chance to shape the focus of our inquiry; the focus group will also help us recruit students who would like to participate in our project for the long haul. We hope to work with our student team to develop a plan for the fall semester, especially to develop our inquiry questions and methods for capturing authentic video footage.
Berkeley City College Calendar and Budget
Tags: autobiographical narratives, classroom discussions, educational success, focus group, inquiry questions, inquiry team, locus of control, Metacognition, mid range, rubric, self confidence, self efficacy, spoken communication, student identity, student inquiry, student writing, success and failure, writing assignments
Survey of Students’ Metacognition and Reading
Posted by Katie Hern on February 18, 2009 in Literacy, Metacognition, Pre/Post, Reading, Surveys with 1 Comment
The attached article from the Journal of Educational Psychology includes a useful survey instrument for assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of their own reading strategies. This easy-to-use tool provides feedback to both students and faculty about how students are approaching their academic reading. The survey and scoring rubric are included in the appendix.
Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies
About FIN
The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.
Archives
- January 2011
(1 Post)
- November 2010
(1 Post)
- October 2010
(3 Posts)
- September 2010
(2 Posts)
- August 2010
(1 Post)
- July 2010
(1 Post)
- June 2010
(1 Post)
- May 2010
(3 Posts)
- April 2010
(2 Posts)
- March 2010
(4 Posts)
- February 2010
(4 Posts)
- January 2010
(5 Posts)
- December 2009
(1 Post)
- November 2009
(9 Posts)
- October 2009
(15 Posts)
- September 2009
(3 Posts)
- August 2009
(1 Post)
- July 2009
(3 Posts)
- June 2009
(9 Posts)
- May 2009
(10 Posts)
- April 2009
(8 Posts)
- March 2009
(59 Posts)
- February 2009
(33 Posts)
Recent Post
-
FIN Conference Celebration March 4-5, 2011
by Monique Williams with No Comments
Registration for the conference is open, please register asap http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CQ2NQTQ. Conference registration cost is $50.00 for no... -
Student Run Conference Supported by FIN
by Monique Williams with No Comments
I hope that all of you can attend the Umoja VI student run conference that is being assisted by FIN. The students have come up with many creative appr... -
Parachutes and Ladders X: Celebrating Student Engagement Save the Date for Spring 2011
by Jamie Chandler with No Comments

-
FIN goes to Student Success 2010
by Jamie Chandler with No Comments
Click here to view:
FIN Leadership's Pre Conference Session, Exploring Inquiry: Ideas and Innovations from the Faculty Inquiry Network
Click here ... -
Exploring Routines for Instruction
by Jan Connal with No Comments
Exploring Routines for Instruction
-
Train-the-trainer: Industry2Classroom Teacher Preperation Pipeline
by Jamie Chandler with No Comments
One thing great teachers have in common, no matter what they teach, is skill. They make accommodating 30 or more different learning styles and mul...
Categories
- Acceleration
(5 Posts)
- Basic Skills in Context
(19 Posts)
- Carnegie Perspectives
(1 Post)
- Developing Questions
(9 Posts)
- Equity
(12 Posts)
- Facilitating FIGs
(2 Posts)
- Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG Posts)
(25 Posts)
- FIN Grant Logistics
(7 Posts)
- Integrative Learning
(6 Posts)
- Learning Communities
(10 Posts)
- Learning to Learn
(29 Posts)
- Literacy
(20 Posts)
- Making Visible
(46 Posts)
- Math
(12 Posts)
- Performance Assessment
(1 Post)
- Pre/Post
(4 Posts)
- Proposals
(23 Posts)
- Revised Inquiry Plans
(20 Posts)
- Student Teams
(6 Posts)
- Student Voice
(34 Posts)
- Surveys
(8 Posts)
- Teaching Problem Solving
(3 Posts)
- Technology
(19 Posts)
- Think Alouds
(4 Posts)
- Uncategorized
(87 Posts)
- Using Institutional Research
(7 Posts)
Tags
Tag Cloud
Achievement Gap
Add new tag
African American students
Budget
Cerritos
cerritos college
Chabot
Co-Inquirers
Cognitive development
ece program
Empowerment
Engagement
English
Filming
Habits of Mind
Home Page
hunch
Identity
inquirers
inquiry team
Institutional Data
lesson study
Making Visible
Math
Metacognition
Metacognition Self-Efficacy Inquiry
network budget
Persistence
pre algebra
Progress to Transfer
Puente program
Reading
retreats
Revised Inquiry Plan
san diego mesa
Santa Ana
stipends
Student Interviews
Student Teams
Student Voice
Student Voices
Success
Tutorial
Video
WordPress Acceleration (5)
Basic Skills in Context (16)
Career Technical Education (10)
Carnegie Perspectives (1)
Developing Questions (9)
Equity (12)
Facilitating FIGs (2)
Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG) (25)
Fear (11)
FIN Grant Logistics (7)
Identity (17)
Integrative Learning (6)
Learning Communities (10)
Learning to Learn (17)
Literacy (16)
Making Visible (29)
Math (12)
Metacognition (18)
Multimedia (21)
Performance Assessment (1)
Pre/Post (4)
Proposals (23)
Reading (13)
Revised Inquiry Plans (20)
Student Confidence (17)
Student Interviews (21)
Student Teams (6)
Student Voice (31)
Surveys (8)
Teaching Problem Solving (3)
Technology (19)
Think Alouds (4)
Uncategorized (87)
Using Institutional Research (7)
Video Evidence (26)
Writing (10)
Tagnetic Poetry by Roy Tanck and Merel Zwart requires Flash Player 9 or better.
lesson study
Links
- "How Was The Ride"–Comprehensive view of Accelerated Classrooms
- "Releasing the Trap"–Making the Case for Acceleration in California
- Academic Sustainability Gap
- Acceleration in Context
- Carnegie Conversation about Lesson Study
- Carnegie Foundation
- Faculty Inquiry Network
- The Umoja Community
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
- WP Documentation
- WP Support Forum