Basic Skills in Complex Contexts

FIN Commons

Think Aloud Videos of Art Course Students

Posted by Linda Whitney on May 12, 2010 in Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Learning to Learn, Literacy, Metacognition, Reading, Revised Inquiry Plans, Think Alouds with No Comments


You are welcome to view the first Think Aloud video from our East Los Angeles College FIN team. This post is a revised version of a post on May 12,2010 by Linda Whitney. First, we explain our project and the background to this video.

At East Los Angeles College, our Reading Apprenticeship FIG is a re-conception of our original project. This year, rather than examine a lower-level reading course, we are now looking at how Reading Apprenticeship methods can inform us and allow us to help students as they tackle reading in a wide array of disciplines. The areas of our FIG members include Literature, Basic Skills composition, Basic Skills Reading, Child Development, Politics, Art and Chemistry.  We kicked off with a taping of think-alouds of two students from an ART103 course. Kevin teaches this course at a sister community college, although his full-time job is with East as our Web 2.0 facilitator. Two key advantages to Kevin being the first of our group to tape a think-aloud: 1) his ease and enthusiasm for technology and 2) no other FIG members hold expertise in his content area. Two key disadvantages: 1) Kevin, unlike other FIG members, is not trained yet in Reading Apprenticeship, and 2) Kevin’s students, prior to the evening of the videotaping, had not practiced metacognitive reading techniques.

As you watch the tape, you will see that Student A does little previewing. She pretty much sticks to silent, rapid, reading, and then reacting to specific pieces of text. Katie Hern, upon viewing this tape, noticed neither student verbalized misunderstandings. In the case of Student A, however, Kevin was pleased to see that she specifically paused at the parts of the text he had stressed in that night’s lecture.

At this point, she may have decided to concentrate on the areas of understanding, and delay looking at areas of misunderstanding until a future re-reading. Student B, whose video is not posted, appears to do little more than read and then paraphrase. However, Kevin reports that Student B displayed a more reflective process during the practice session that night, and that his nervousness about the camera apparently flawed his true abilities. Katie is likely correct that the student’s nervousness reflects his need “not to appear stupid.”

Our group never settled on how much prior preparation to provide the students for Think Aloud and how we might assure that students use an array of techniques as they use Think Alouds. Most of our Think Aloud videos did not involve much prior preparation except for some modelling by the instructor.

We posted the Art text pages, this video, and many resources related to our FIG Reading Apprenticeship exploration on our group facebook page. Eventually we found that facebook postings were too technically challenging and we reverted to emails.

http://qtss.elac.edu/elac/oid/kevin/readerA.mov

LMC Puente/Math: Data and English: An undiscovered country

Posted by Maria Tuttle on March 21, 2009 in Developing Questions, Integrative Learning, Learning Communities, Literacy, Math, Reading, Writing with 1 Comment


Announcement!

Lesson study accomplished (but we still have to survey the information gathered, so not completely accomplished but you get what I mean). Our lesson study was organized as a series of three classes with each class serving to build skills and synthesize ideas between the reading and statistical information in regards to social class.

Reflection 2

Day 3, the final day of our study, felt better than day 2. Let me qualify “felt better.” What I mean here is that day 2 seemed to go slowly primarily because students seemed stuck not only in deciphering difficult terminology in the article like “rhetorical fringe” but also because they then had to tie complex main ideas, quotes, and analysis of those quotes to reading data accurately and then being specific with their explanations of that data. Oh yeah, and I add that everything had to connect to the textual main idea and answer a unit question. (I shudder at the ambition of our project.) This is what I observed as helpful to students in terms of seeing and using data; Myra asked two essential questions when she explained how to read the information: who is being described and what is being measured? (The light bulbs that popped on were truly blinding.) I place emphasis on this observation because what Myra asked is what I ask when I teach reading: who is being described and what is taking place? Do you see any other implications? I am eager to hear what you think.

Let me tease out the connection further. By choosing common strategies that will work to connect math and English, students are becoming “literate” in multiple disciplines. I place quotations around this word because I think that literacy is more than the ability to read a novel, a poem, an essay. Literacy is the accumulation and understanding of knowledge, any field of knowledge (and that could mean cultural knowledge as well as skill based knowledge, like, oh yeah, I know who Plato is and of course I know the function of a Z chart, plus let me tell you about AB540 students). In previous conversations with students, the definition of literacy was brilliantly simple: the ability to read and understand what you read.

I end by saying that this lesson was not perfect. I think both Myra and I were putting our best feet forward–teaching-wise–possibly trying to0 much with the hopes of finding out as much as possible. I am at fault. I cooked up the concept while Myra invented exercises that would coincide with what I “cooked up.” The result was yummy, but maybe a little too rich. Before I close let me add what I found delicious: Myra’s “data sandwich.” Here is another common strategy that I use when I teach writing. Essentially, the formula is this: They say x. I say y. The X in this equation is what the author says, the quote. The Y is an analysis of that quote. (Am I using math concepts unknowingly? I’ll admit to enjoying addition and subtraction, maybe even algebra. I definitely like geometry.) The result is a “quotation sandwich.” Don’t groan. I know thousands upon thousands of English teachers use this strategy all the time. I only point out this connection because of what Myra was able to invent to dovetail with this skill: the “data sandwich.”

Questions to consider

Let me work my tired brain a bit more. Should our approach be to invent and connect skill-based strategies rather than thematic approaches for the developmental classes? We fully intend to collaborate on major assignments. However, I am wondering if we should wait until the students reach transfer-level English and math to launch fully integrated projects.

Los Medanos College/English: Revised Inquiry Plan

Posted by Joellen Hiltbrand on March 10, 2009 in Equity, Reading, Using Institutional Research with No Comments


A.    Zoom-Lens Inquiry: Focusing on Students

1)    What data will you gather and analyze on individual students? (e.g. student work, self-reflections, interviews, videotaped think-alouds or problem-solving)

In the first two weeks of class, we asked the students to fill out a reading survey. Among other things, the survey asked them to identify “texts” they read outside of school (such as magazines, newspapers, websites, etc).
We are also creating in-class goal groups that will meet at least six times during the semester. There is some variation in what each instructor will ask the goal work to focus on (for example, one instructor is asking students to create goals focused on the course SLOs, while others are more focused on personal as well as academic goals). As part of this work, students are asked to write reflective paragraphs at the end of each goal group session.

2)    How do you imagine this data will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating? In other words, how does the data connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?

One focus of our inquiry is how to more successfully engage African American students in Engl 70 by using more culturally relevant reading materials. In order to do this, we need to know what it is students are reading outside of school, so that we can integrate more culturally relevant material, both in terms of content as well as style.
Another focus of our inquiry is that of greater engagement. As a part of that focus, we plan to help students focus on goals that will help them succeed. Their reflections about this process will be invaluable.

3)    When and how will you collect this data? (e.g. Which classes will you target? Where will you conduct interviews or think-alouds?)

The reading surveys were collected during the first two weeks of class. The reflective paragraphs will be collected after each goal group section.

4)    When will you analyze this data? (e.g. mid-semester team retreat, after lesson-study session, at the end of the semester )

We haven’t determined that yet, but it will be before the end of May so that we can make needed curricular changes for the Fall 2009 semester.

5.) How will you analyze the data?

We don’t have a set plan for this analysis. It’s safe to assume that all four team members, as well as the two other Engl 70 instructors involved, will read both the surveys and the paragraphs and discuss any themes or patterns that they observe.

Mid-Range Shots: Focusing on the Classroom

1)    Please name ONE specific lesson in a particular course that will give you a good vantage point for observing student learning relevant to your Inquiry.

The lesson we will focus on is helping students apply the concepts introduced in Martin Luther King’s “Three Ways of Meeting Oppression” to the memoir Warriors Don’t Cry and to their own life experience. This is a departure from the more standard academic prompt we have used in the past with this memoir, and we hope it will more directly engage students as they reflect on how they choose to respond to perceived and actual oppression in their lives.

2)    How do you imagine the Lesson Study will help you understand the problem/issue you’re investigating about students and their learning? In other words, how does it connect to and inform the overall focus of your inquiry?

This lesson will help us to observe the reaction of our African -American students to culturally relevant readings and pedagogy.  We have intentionally revised the usual essay prompt for Warriors Don’t Cry in order to bring in students’ experiences and perspectives on responding to oppression.

3)    When and how will your team conduct this Lesson Study? Please detail the timeframes and participants for the three parts of the Lesson Study process (collaboratively planning the lesson, teaching/observing the lesson, and debriefing/analyzing videotapes & student work from the lesson).

This lesson study is a collaboration between two English 70 faculty: Katalina Wethington and Nancy Ybarra

  • Part 1: We met to plan the essay prompt and the supplemental readings during week 6.
  • Part 2: We plan to teach and observe the lesson after students finish reading the memoir, but prior to introducing the essay assignment. (Between weeks 8 and 12)
  • Part 3: We will meet between weeks 15 and 17 to discuss and analyze observations about our teaching of the lesson. We will also discuss the extent to which students were able to apply the concepts in the article to the book and their own life experiences in the essay.

4)    What kinds of things will the observers be looking/listening for during the lesson? What artifacts of student learning and student experience will the team collect during the lesson? Will you videotape any portion of this process (pre-planning, lesson, debrief)?

During the lesson we will look for ways in which the instructor encourages students to:

  • Make text to self connections.
  • Make text to text connections.
  • Engage with other students and the subject matter.
  • Deepen their comprehension of the concepts contained in the article and apply them in multiple contexts.
  • We will not videotape any portion of this process.
  • We will collect student essays, summaries of the article, and student reflections on their own experiences with oppression.
  • We will write reflections on our teaching of the lesson and our perceptions of student response.

5) What questions/concerns do you have about this element of your Inquiry? How can your Inquiry Coach support you in this phase of your Inquiry?

  • We are not ready for the cameras.
  • Is the article too difficult for the students? Will they comprehend it?
  • Will those students who have not experienced oppression still be engaged?
  • What is the most effective way to help the students synthesize the article, the memoir and their own experiencees

Wide Angle Lens: Focusing on Larger Trends in Institutional Data

1)    What data from your Institutional Research Office will you integrate into your Inquiry?

  1. We are keeping track of attendance and drop patterns of all students in our four pilot sections in Spring 2009, and will specifically target those of African American students starting in Fall 2009. In order to do so, we have requested the student data for the four sections disaggregated by ethnicity, age, and gender.
    • Each of the four instructors is sending the team leader the student IDs of students who appear to have dropped the course (or at least are no longer attending).
    • The team leader is sending out form letters to those students, asking them for feedback about if they have dropped the course, and if so, why. The students do not have to fill out any personal information on the letters. Those letters include a SASE addressed to the team leader, so that we may collect data about the stories behind students’ choices.
  2. We will also be looking at persistence patterns after the first semester, disaggregated by the same categories as above (as well as by stated goals, if recorded)
  3. We will also be analyzing student pass rates
  4. As part of the Engl 70 curriculum, students are required to see an academic counselor and create an educational plan. The Developmental Education Committee has already started a research project examining how this requirement influences student persistence. We will use this data as part of our look at persistence.

2)    How will this data help?

In contrast to the classroom and student-focused data, which will help us understand the student experience and student perception of our work on engagement and culturally relevant pedagogy and their influence on retention and success for African American students, this look at the numbers will give us, first of all, a baseline from which to measure our work. Secondly, it will allow us to make some comparative evaluations of the pilot sections vs the other stand-alone sections. The numbers are in no way the whole story, but they are an important part of the story.

Our goal in this grant is to create and refine methods that can be used by all Engl 70 instructors, regardless of their commitment to equity perspectives, their status in the institution, and their commitments elsewhere, to increase the retention and success rates of African American students in Engl 70. To that end, the methods we ultimately recommend to the Engl dept must be efficient, cost-effective, easily incorporated into the curriculum, and usable by adjunct faculty members, who teach at least 70% of the Engl 70 sections.

In order to make these kinds of sweeping programmatic suggestions, our efforts have to be reflected in the retention, persistence, and success rate figures for the course for all four sections. So a close monitoring and evaluation of those numbers is essential to our goal.

Questions and Concerns:

  • Will the numbers and the student perceptions match each other?
  • What if none of the students who drop mail back the letters?
  • Will any of the numerical data be meaningful enough to warrant changes in curriculum and pedagogy for all Engl 70 instructors?

Timeline for Spring 2009

Timeline for Spring 2009

REVISED BUDGET

revised-budget

Reading Between The Lives

Posted by Sean McFarland on March 3, 2009 in Developing Questions, Fear, Identity, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Making Visible, Metacognition, Reading, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Voice, Video Evidence with No Comments


 

A long, long time ago, in a college about a quarter mile off Interstate 880…four students and a teacher, fueled by a SPECC grant, set out on an epic quest to ask the questions no one dared to ask about reading. Facing over 125 daunting student intake essays, 50 hours of intensive interviews, and trudging through 300 hours of post-production they emerged with a victorious 60-minute movie and restored freedom in the collegiate galaxy.

The Creation of Reading Between The Lives was generously supported by: SPECC (Strengthening Pre-collegiate Education in Community Colleges), a joint project of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

 

The Sorceress’s Apprentices

Posted by Sean McFarland on March 3, 2009 in Acceleration, Fear, Identity, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Making Visible, Metacognition, Reading, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Voice, Video Evidence with No Comments


In this video, Chabot College Basic Skills students demonstrate and discuss effective reading strategies they have learned over the course of the semester. English Instructor Alisa Klevens discusses how she adapts Reading Apprenticeship concepts to meet the needs of these students. 

 

 

About FIN

The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.

  • Recent Post

  • Tag Cloud