Basic Skills in Complex Contexts

FIN Commons

Laney FIN team discussion

Posted by Sonja Franeta on November 19, 2009 in Basic Skills in Context, Equity, Faculty Inquiry Groups (FIG), Fear, Identity, Integrative Learning, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Making Visible, Metacognition, Student Confidence with No Comments


Discussion about student expectations of college and difficulties Latino students have with the idea of going to community college. Also, the benefits of doing the interviews by Esdras.

Marvin and Raul pairwork

Posted by Sonja Franeta on November 12, 2009 in Basic Skills in Context, Career Technical Education, Integrative Learning, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Performance Assessment, Student Teams, Student Voice, Think Alouds, Video Evidence with No Comments


An example of contextualized learning, using the think aloud method–student takes time to produce the words he is looking to express. Teacher coaches and other student helps. The student then uses motions in the repetition of recalled expression.
Marvin and Raul pairwork

Laney Carpinteria Fina Inquiry Challenges

Posted by Sonja Franeta on April 20, 2009 in Basic Skills in Context, Career Technical Education with 2 Comments


Laney Wood Tech ShopRoy Robles asked why we weren’t posting anything so here I am. Our group is a bilingual (Spanish-English) ESL and Wood Technology (cabinet-making) program. We work together in the shop and classroom and do contextualized teaching/learning.

Here are a few of our challenges: Getting to the inquiry question and documenting student concerns. I am constantly amazed at how hard it it is to get to a researchable inquiry question. Katie Hern worked with our FIN group not too long ago and we spent a lot of time describing different lessons finally identifying a research question that might be more specific than “how does contextualized learning work for students?” For example, in a specific lesson what evidence do we have of student learning–written or through interviews. Then we could analyze that.

We realized that often students would not be completely honest on video even if the interviews were conducted by fellow students on learning. Our student inquirers told us of instances where students said more to them once the video camera was turned off, almost confidentially. We discussed interviewing student inquirers after they do the interviews of students to gather more information. If confidentiality is a problem, names could be left out and the student inquirer could say: “One student I interviewed said…” Anyway it’s an interesting problem and a good way to get more documentation.

Another interesting challenge that came up during out FIN meeting was this: Esdras, one of our student inquirers, mentioned the “roughness” of communication at the workplaces and how students don’t get prepared for this in our program. We thought about conflict resolution methods or simply having some discussion on discrimination and ways of reacting/responding (role-playing). This is a very difficult situation to replicate or prepare students for.

I myself have worked in shops and factories (as a woman machinist) where life or death questions have come up on the shop floor, or where people say some of the most horrible things about women, blacks, Latinos, gays or lesbians. These are real situations that I was so glad were brought up–a result of student involvement in our FIN project. These are just some thoughts and reflections I wanted to blog about.

Door Number One

Posted by Sean McFarland on March 8, 2009 in Equity, Fear, Identity, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Making Visible, Metacognition, Multimedia, Student Confidence, Student Voice, Video Evidence with No Comments


Door Number One offers introductory profiles of a dozen of the many Programs and Services offered at Chabot College. Students, Staff, and Faculty share their experiences and offer their perspectives about why these Programs and Services are so vital, and what students can expect if they just “Pick One.” And along the way, we see what it takes to successfully repel a Zombie Student Attack on Chabot College!

 

 

The creation of  Door Number One was generously supported by:

* SPECC (Strengthening Pre-collegiate Education in Community Colleges), a joint project of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

*Chabot Student Services Funding for Retention Initiatives

*Chabot Enrollment Management Committee (CEMC)

*CLPCCD Office of Public Information and Marketing

Daraja: A Syllabus For Life

Posted by Sean McFarland on March 6, 2009 in Equity, Fear, Identity, Learning Communities, Learning to Learn, Literacy, Making Visible, Metacognition, Multimedia, Reading, Student Confidence, Student Interviews, Student Voice, Video Evidence, Writing with 2 Comments


 

The Daraja project, founded in 1988 at Chabot College is widely recognized as one of the best opportunities for success for underrepresented students, especially African-American students, in the California community-college system. In this film, current and former Daraja students speak candidly about their educational preparation before entering Daraja and then share their personal needs and professional goals. Daraja staff and faculty also offer their perspectives about the “family” that is created over the course of a school year. Daraja: A Syllabus For Life is a rich, engaging portrayal of a program that changes lives. For Educators and students who have never experienced this kind of program, the film offers an intimate lens into what it would be like to have an Umoja community on their campus.

The creation of Daraja: A Syllabus For Life was generously supported by: SPECC (Strengthening Pre-collegiate Education in Community Colleges), a joint project of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.

(Note: the film starts at around 22 seconds on the timeline)

 

About FIN

The Faculty Inquiry Network’s (FIN) purpose is to support professional development which includes: conducting faculty inquiry; revisiting basic skills assumptions; interpreting and integrating data; accessing student voices; developing students as co-inquirers; making visible; using technology for teaching and learning; creating and supporting new initiatives, curriculum and program development; constructing educational tools using digital media; and hosting dialogue around student and faculty learning.

  • Recent Post

  • Tag Cloud